Use of Real Estate Deeds to Establish
Family Connections
The first installment of this series discussed how the use of
real estate deeds obtained through the Family History Center at the Godfrey
Memorial Library can be a way to uncover spousal identity.
In this second installment, the use of real estate deeds to
identify other family relationships is discussed.
The use of wills was not overly prevalent during the 19th
century, especially in rural areas. Many
adults died relatively young and unexpectedly due to the outbreak of a
particularly virulent illness. In those
intestate situations, the deceased’s land would be divided between his spouse
(dower’s right) and any children. Often
times, however, some of the land had to be first sold to satisfy an estate’s
debts. Typically, the division of land
either left small parcels which the heirs would then typically sell or if a
division of the land could not be agreed upon, then the heirs sold their
interests prior to any division of the land.
For instance, my great-great grandfather, Philip W. Smith, died
intestate in 1878 in Sussex County, New Jersey. His ten surviving children sold off the 51
acres inherited to one of their cousins. We find a transaction in 1881 which states
that six of the heirs of Philip W. Smith are each selling their one-tenth
interest, for a total amount conveyed of six-tenths. This confirms the identity of six of the
children and also states which ones were married at that time, along with the
name of each spouse. These six lived in
or near Sussex County. A seventh heir
executed at the same time a separate deed to sell his one-tenth interest
because he was stated as living in Illinois at that time, thus providing
information on his location. The other
three children were still minors in 1881 but each executed a deed later to sell
their one-tenth interest upon reaching 21 years of age. This was a very typical pattern and helps to
1) identify living children; 2) identify their locations; and 3) identify the
names of spouses. If the heir was a
female and married, then the full name of her husband would be stated since
women at that time could not own land separate of their spouse.
Similarly, another relative, named Lodewick Smith died
intestate in early 1810 in Sussex County.
In this case, his widow decided to be the administratrix of his
estate. During the proceedings to settle
the estate, an 1817 deed reveals that she has remarried since she is identified
as “Mary Teeple, formerly Mary Smith….Administratrix of the estate of Lodewick
Smith, deceased…” This was further
confirmed by an 1812 marriage record between Joseph Teeple and Mary Smith. With a common name such as Smith, this type
of confirming record is critical. And
similar to the first example discussed, her three children later each sold
their one-third interest. In this case,
a daughter was married and her husband was fully identified.
The above two examples provide just two examples of how
interesting family relationships can be found in deeds.
No comments:
Post a Comment